“A ROADMAP FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TEACHING IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE EVALUATION OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS”

Authors

  • To‘xtamisheva Dilrabo Shermonovna Independent researcher at the Higher School of Business and Entrepreneurship under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Keywords:

quality of education, digital technologies, teaching effectiveness, digitalization of education, electronic learning platforms (LMS), digital pedagogy.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a strategy for improving the quality of teaching through the implementation of digital technologies in the educational process and to evaluate its effectiveness. The research methods include literature analysis, surveys and expert assessment, as well as the measurement of effectiveness based on statistical indicators. As a result, a roadmap for the integration of digital technologies has been developed, and criteria for evaluating its effectiveness have been identified. The findings of the study are intended to be used as practical recommendations for enhancing the quality of education.

References

Asian Development Bank (2023). Reimagining Tech-Inclusive Education: Evidence, Practices, and a Road Map. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Available at: https://www.adb.org/publications/tech-inclusive-education-evidence-practices-road-map (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

Crompton, H. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators: A Guide for Teachers and Other Professionals. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Available at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_books/24/ (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

Davis, F.D. (1989). ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

Desimone, L.M. (2009). ‘Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures’, Educational Researcher, 38(3), pp. 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0013189x08331140 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2025). ISO 21001:2025 Educational organizations — Management systems for educational organizations — Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/21001 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

OECD (2024). Education Policy Outlook 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-policy-outlook-2024_dd5140e4-en.html (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

UNESCO (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO. doi:10.54675/EWZM9535. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

UNICEF (2026). UNICEF Digital Education Strategy 2025–2030 (publication date: January 2026). New York: UNICEF. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/digitaleducation/reports/unicef-digital-education-strategy-2025-2030 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

World Bank (2024). Digital Pathways for Education: Enabling Greater Impact for All. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/9673fd74-1bf4-4693-b45f-374a64464c63 (Accessed: 5 February 2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-24

How to Cite

To‘xtamisheva Dilrabo Shermonovna. (2026). “A ROADMAP FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TEACHING IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE EVALUATION OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS”. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE & INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH ISSN: 2277-3630 Impact Factor: 8.036, 15(02), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/2848