QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY MEASURES

Authors

  • Akhmedova Mavluda Associate Professor of the Department of "Economics, Finance and Accounting" of the TMC Institute, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Income distribution; Income inequality; Poverty measurement; Gini coefficient; FGT poverty indices; Lorenz curve; Quantitative analysis; Socio-economic indicators.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive quantitative analysis of income distribution and poverty measures, focusing on the assessment of income inequality and the depth, severity, and incidence of poverty within an economy. Using officially reported household income and expenditure data, the research applies widely recognized statistical and econometric tools, including the Gini coefficient, Lorenz curve, Theil index, and Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures. The study aims to identify structural disparities in income allocation, evaluate poverty dynamics across population groups, and examine the sensitivity of poverty indicators to changes in income distribution. Descriptive statistics and inequality decomposition techniques are employed to capture both inter-group and intra-group income differences, while trend analysis is used to evaluate temporal changes in poverty levels. The findings reveal persistent income inequality and highlight the uneven distributional effects of economic growth, with vulnerable households disproportionately exposed to poverty risks. The results emphasize the importance of evidence-based social and fiscal policies aimed at inclusive growth, targeted income support, and effective poverty reduction strategies. The study contributes to the empirical literature by offering a statistically robust framework for monitoring income inequality and poverty and provides practical insights for policymakers and researchers engaged in socio-economic development planning.

References

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013

Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8018-5254-4

Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913475

Ravallion, M. (2016). The economics of poverty: History, measurement, and policy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212766.001.0001

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2022). Poverty and shared prosperity 2022: Correcting course. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1893-6

United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human development report 2023/24: Breaking the gridlock. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org

State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics. (2023). Household income and living standards statistical bulletin. https://stat.uz

Mustafaqulov, S. I. (2020). Poverty measurement and reduction strategies in Uzbekistan. Economy and Innovative Technologies, 2, 45–53.

Qurbondurdiev, M. Q. (2019). Trends in population income distribution in Uzbekistan. Journal of Economic Research of Uzbekistan, 4, 32–41.

Ministry of Economic Development and Poverty Reduction of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). National strategy for poverty reduction. https://mineconomy.uz

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Uzbekistan: Inclusive growth and poverty reduction. ADB Publications. https://www.adb.org

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Akhmedova Mavluda. (2025). QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY MEASURES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE & INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH ISSN: 2277-3630 Impact Factor: 8.036, 14(12), 155–161. Retrieved from https://www.gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/2809